So basically each turn you have to choose what to do from: upgrading your defense (note also that fences and the castle itself plays almost the same thing, because any attacker will first destroy your fence and then lower your castle), upgrading your resources or try attack in some way. Now as you and increpare are 'really interested' to that comparison about those games, aren't you? i'm going to explain it quickly:Ĭastlewars has a very simple structure for a battle card game, it doesn't feature any battleground, it has only few cards all almost with the same use: upgrade your fence (the only type of defense you have) upgrade your castle (it's like your HP), upgrade some other stats or attack in some manner. In the end he also stated that maybe i can't undestand his great elucubrations because i'm italian.

Then he started pointing at me saying maybe i got a sort of fear or something that keeps me talking better about a free game instead one that i paid for, and that's plain stupid. All that stuff in a thread that was intended to talk about another game than maybe he never played, also because he replied so fast stabbing it down. Then i simply stated that the game he linked was bad because the lack of any strategy deepness compared to Spectromancer and because it's also ugly to see. He first started accusing me to be a sort of salesman, sure, i did 500 posts here only to cover my true intent to promote this game.

Spectromancer gamers pack